another interesting point was how being "scientific", and looking at individual factors in isolation (e.g. vitamins) missed the forest for the trees, and did more harm than good.
another takeaway was the extent to which "studies" are pushed around/mediated by big political interests, e.g. the meat lobby and the marketing muscle (the suns, microsofts, and Extreme Programming vendors of the food world) that have a big interest in keeping the status quo.
And just as the article points out, it gave away its whole article with the words "Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants."
The overall organization is little forced at times, but the research for each section is really interesting.
