Proper inference should consider all available data not just historical data.

Just waving around numbers is not correct reasoning from first principles!

Correct and proper inference should include present threats, beliefs and intentions of relevant groups. Do you account for that?

Just because an axe-wielding madman has not committed any murders in the past, you would not let him be on his own.

Just an instant before the bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, nobody in that city had been killed by an atom bomb. You would probably stare at the bomb dropping on your head waving around stats saying the bomb is not a threat to your existence.

"The past never repeats itself precisely; otherwise, historians would be rolling in riches." - James Gipson, Clipper Fund

Your comment is a one-way attack on sanity. It would take me a lot of effort to show where you went wrong. It takes you only a bit of effort to be wrong.

Let's not forget the roughly 15,000 people murdered each year in the US (which number does not, as far as I know, count drunk driving fatalities). If those don't count as "wrongful death" then nothing does. But nobody cares, because it's a continuous drip instead of a single big event, and because it mostly happens to poor people and minorities.