2010: Tube tiled with app icons
2011: Apple logo "window" into space tiled with app icons
2012: Apple logo made up of translucent round rects (stylized app icons) of various colors.
2013: Translucent round rects stacked on top of each other
[1]: http://arstechnica.com/apple/2011/09/apple-sends-invites-for...
But for Apple's core apps, such as the Map app, it's pretty clear that I'm in the Map app and not in Messages. Furthermore, Facebook and Twitter have about 3-4 years of color-branding experience on their side...in that, I automatically recognize their respective shades of blue as belonging to them.
In addition, this color-splash for core apps seem to add a few negative consequences:
1. It couples colors to apps in a way that may be detrimental for the operating experience in general...for example, if I've been "trained" to think that "green" means "Message" app...that causes a bit of a disjoint for third-party messaging apps that do not use green.
2. Will "danger" buttons (such as "Delete") no longer be red, in the case that one of the core apps has red as its splash color?
3. Will the use of color be so critical in distinguishing the core apps that color blind users will operate at a disadvantage?
My guess is the core UI (home screen, title bar, alerts, notification center) will simply get a face lift, while individual apps will need to update to take advantage. I doubt we'll see a Metro style overhaul.
Not only does it appear not to, but prior to this comment, the string "osx" is not in this comment thread anywhere.
2. Designs that used to be helpful are then considered clutter.
3. UIs become flatter.
4. New category of hardware is introduced
5. rinse and repeat
Access - Red
Excel - Green
OneNote - Purple
Outlook - Blue
Publisher - Teal
PowerPoint - Orange
Word - Navy Blue
New headline suggestion: "Apple Copies Microsoft Design Ideas"? Just kidding! Associating a color with each product in your lineup is an old practice.
It's funny that blogs and articles about this upcoming change never even mention Microsoft or Metro. Apple copying Microsoft creates cognitive dissonance [2], it is counter to the strong belief that Apple is the industry leader in design.
[1] http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/apps/hh78123...
That's pretty cool how they almost achieved a "mirror" effect for the characters.
Kind of hard to put that on device lids/backs, though. But it would look nice on stickers.
P.S. Amusingly, http://danhadi.com/blog/?p=526 (classic rainbow on modern lid) comes up in fourth place for me with https://www.google.com/search?q=rainbow+apple+logo
It could be simpler, but I think that would detract from it.
http://www.techglued.com/wwdc-2013-keynote-address-scheduled...
I'd like to see a rethink of how certain things like notifications are accessed. Swiping should be from the bottom, not the top. It's very hard to stretch one handed to access it. We should be able to set custom default apps. Being able to have micro views in apps that can display on the lock screen would be great.
So I'm with you, I don't like change for the sake of change. But as a 5 year iOS user myself, there's definitely room for some updates.
On the other hand change in unavoidable. They cannot stop in time. Each iOS version that gets released with minimal changes is another catch up that will need to take place in a later version. The more changes are delayed the bigger they get. Android and even Windows Phone are moving forward and so needs Apple.
I think that there can be a certain feeling inside Apple that is not exactly change aversion but maybe is something close. They got iPhone so right and had so much success with it that maybe there is some fear that introducing significant changes can mess things up...
Think how many peoples' apps would break if they went to Flat UI, think how many users they would alienate? Think how iOS is supposed to have some kinship with OS X design ethos. Is anything in OS X flat?
Linen is staying. Drop shadows, gloss and rounded corners are staying.
The OS X comparison you are making is bad because before now Jonathan Ive wasn't in charge of user-interface design, Scott Forstall was. Both of them have drastically different aesthetic design tastes.
It's well known that Jonathan Ive finds textures such as the linen and corinthian leather tacky. They will be removed.