undefined | Better HN

0 pointsbornhuetter13y ago0 comments

Well - which is more efficient?

0 pointsbornhuetter13y ago0 comments

Well - which is more efficient?

0 comments

7 comments · 2 top-level

akerbeltz13y ago· 3 in thread

At least in terms of size, the mp3 strings are 23%~ lighter than the ogg strings.

Curious what quality they encoded them with.

The ogg's bitrate is 35kb/s. The mp3's bitrate is 32kb/s. The sample rate for both is 11025 Hz.

It is a fart sound... how much quality do they need? lol

rubinelli13y ago· 2 in thread

What's important is that neither stinks.

I would say that including two audio assets for the same sound seems like a code smell.

Perhaps an MP3 => OGG JavaScript converter is in order.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse