Right now, there is not one "marketplace" where a business owner can go to find the best designers, especially for websites. Without knowing their options, I've seen many businesses settle for a) a crappy site by their local yellow pages outfit b) the first result for "[my city] web designer" c) one of those do-it-yourself site builders or d) no website at all. A centralized directory of vetted designers makes a lot of sense for easier discovery.
One other thing that would make sense is an Airbnb-style rating system, so designers can start earning a verifiable reputation based on prior work that originated through Scoutzie.
The Scoutzie founders were very nice and understanding people to work with throughout the whole process and I'm sure this new product will be a success.
PS: I'm glad the site works fine without Javascript enabled.
Who does this and why? Do you like browsing the web where 80% of website's functionality is broken because you think its a good idea to browse with JavaScript disabled. Makes no sense.
I'm one of them. I do this because of malicious adverts and because of tracking systems. These cost privacy, but also real money (a well-publicized exampple is ordering airline tickets)
> Do you like browsing the web where 80% of website's functionality is broken because you think its a good idea to browse with JavaScript disabled. Makes no sense.
I agree, it wouldn't make sense if people liked broken websites, and I'm pretty sure that they don't. But I think what you mean is that I should enable JS because it is in wide use. For me, that is not a good enough reason.
As a former web application developer, I do believe that most of those websites could do fine without JS!
18.28 (nojs) vs 21.45 (w/js) bits of identifying information using Chrome.
Open pricing may drive out all but the most aggressive talent.
He later apologized, but I bring this up only because the quality curation aspect previously spoken to is non-existent, even though that was supposed to be a selling point and something that set them apart from their competitors. I was excited about this because I feel that every other site in this market is oversaturated and makes it more difficult to connect designers to gigs. To the same point, both iterations of the website have been awful both in design and usability, losing my trust in the founders' abilities to curate to begin with.
Now that it seems anyone of any talent or skillset are allowed in, I don't see how it's any different than Dribbble, Behance, Coroflot, Zerply, 99designs, or even personal portfolios. I fail to see value in this site over any of the aforementioned, especially because you're taking part of my potential income (and planning on airing my personal rates) in the process. What is the benefit here?
Scoutzie is not for everyone, and we don't hold it against you if you choose not to participate. We do, however, aim to provide as much value to our members as we can, working to bring out the features they have requested. I understand that sometimes we make mistakes and we try to correct them. We cannot please everyone, but I know for a fact that we had a great number of successful project, which means clients and designers who were happy with the outcome.
I can assure that you we will work tireless to continue improving the experience and to ensure that our community is happy.
Any design related platform should expect an inordinate amount of aesthetic & UX criticism, so I don't think this comment is out of line.
To offer something constructive, I would suggest developing an overall theme to the thumbnails (e.g. tight cropping on a detail, bringing in the color palette). This will give the homepage a higher level of aesthetic consistency. Your homepage is the most vital marketing piece in regards to convincing high quality talent to get on board.
chrome, mountain lion. clicking back/forward button gives a page of json
1. go to home page 2. select iphone 3. on iphone page, select ipad 4. go back twice (to homepage) 5. click forward 6. page of json
this happens in other cases too, like just going back. but above is totally reproducible on my setup