The Giraffe one from the OP was super cool though :)
Once you focus too much on "what's inside", it gets a bit confusing because you're seeing conflicting things (like the tree leave that is also people): but it's not a problem because it's not meant for people to really focus on.
And somehow it just works. I find several of these logos really very simple and great.
Now that this has been posted on HN I expect lots of startups to come up with similar logos ; )
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/70/Hartford...
But that this logo won 40 awards? (Note that I'm automatically assuming that the awards are meaningful.) I'm definitely someone who has to pay for design, because I just don't get it.
WiredPR, Oak Bro, Fingers, Giraffe... these are all excellent. Makes me very envious of the creator's talent and creativity!
Very interesting, as I'm about to shell out some cash for a logo designer.
http://blog.crowdspring.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/goodw...
I quite like the idea of having a smiley in a company name actually…
The D with the E looks like a power plug.
I don't think these are great examples. They are 'school' examples maybe, but some of these look amateurish
For example, the 4x (Fox) breaks the left-to-right convention, you can't identify it as such until you see it all. Some others haven't gotten the gist of the idea (forgot the word, sorry) and do things just because.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/1901656/OGC-unveils-new-logo...