But when you said "It's not spam, it's just so very wrong." you made it sound like you must know of some hard evidence that actually debunked the article, rather than just the same general skepticism that tokenadult already expressed.
I'm pretty sure Femur was asking you for some more details of that evidence.
For me an experiment who's results can't be replicated, indeed have not been replicated since 1924, is as wrong as wrong can be. It is 2 + 2 = 5
For you and Femur it is perhaps merely reasonable skepticism. Perhaps you were expecting some proof that it is wrong, not just lack of proof that it is right?
In science inability to reproduce is where the buck stops. There are no further attempts to actually prove wrongness.
Indeed I was.
