3 Things:
My biggest issue with the site is that you don't show the final product anywhere. It should really be the hero of your home page (where that little dude with the chalkboard is). Even if you don't have one printed yet, make a fake print+frame in Photoshop (not hard) and throw it on an istock living room image [1].
Second, your "Buy Now" button should be other places besides the top-right corner. Took me a while to find it. Look at our site or others that sell just 1 thing. You need a big CTA button middle-left. A/B Test it for sure.
Third, consider offering a frame as an add-on. I don't think you can walk in to Target and get a frame that fits an 8x36 print and most people won't go through the additional step of finding one or having it made. You want repeat customers and the best way to get them is to make sure they use/see the product the first time they buy. At the very least, tell them where they can find frames to fit your prints and put that on your site and email receipts.
That's all I got for now. Good job.
[1] http://www.istockphoto.com/search/text/blank%20living%20room...
We have that feature ready to go but I'm trying to clear some legal/copyright questions first. For most people who want to just combine their images with friends/family, it's fine. But there are people on Instagram who wouldn't want me making money from their images being hung on other people's walls.
As others have mentioned - image optimization will help you a lot. Taking a look at firebug Net profiling, the homepage footprint weighs in at 2MB. 500K is your "studio" image, followed by the bridge bg photo at 370K.
So just optimizing these 2 images will reduce your bandwidth by around 660K or 33%. I'm guessing you can do both in 210K (150K bridge, 60K studio = 210K) possibly better.
EDIT: decided to actually fix it instead of just talking about it.
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/6653594/pantastic-there-i-fixed-it....
studio.jpg photoshop jpg 70 quality ggb.jpg photoshop jpg 80 quality
old: 494k + 369k = 863k new: 64k + 1k + 70k = 135k
savings = 728K or 36% of your total homepage footprint.
Save more by splitting all your polaroid shadows to png, and the photos to jpg 60-80 quality.
Requires html/css change to layout studio image as 2 images stacked on top (separate shadow png)
I am sure it didn't help that we were all hammering the site.
That's a long way from St. Louis, and a long way from your basement.
1. Your pic: http://i.imgur.com/Ub3FVCy.jpg
2. Studio: http://www.magnoliaeditions.com/exhibitions/magnolia-edition...
3. Same pic: http://www.artltdmag.com/index.php?subaction=showfull&id...;
Photographers don't take to kindly to companies using their work without permission.
To Pantastic: Without credibility, you have nothing. Be honest in your product description.
Also, publish an API for this. You can get a lot of business with a photo printing API. Don't ask how I know... ;)
Also I have no clue how to do an api lol
Also, a single-person operation isn't usually called a "team". And while it's impressive that a college student can run a successful business, it's possible that emphasizing this on the web site might scare away potential customers who are businesses with deadlines to meet. Why limit your market unnecessarily?
Some feedback for improvement:
1) I would break the page up into multiple pages. Keep the homepage simple and let the user click ancillary links if they need to.
2) It says the printing is done in the founders basement, but shows a picture of a printing warehouse. Is your basement a printing warehouse? Honestly not sure here.
3) The textures are distracting, I'd tone them down.
4) A blurred picture of the Golden Gate Bridge is cliche, I'd try something else.
5) The 'What is Pantastic' doesn't really say anything. Statements like "Delivered to your doorstep" (assumed), and #1 quality around (a relative statement with no comparison) don't progress the sale.
The FAQs are hard to read because the line height is the same for everything.
Agree with another comment that says the end product needs to be shown. I don't care how you create the product or what printer you use, just that the end product looks great.
Great idea and good luck.
2) Do you ship internationally? You should answer this in the FAQ.
3) Show me an example of the finished product.
All in all, like the images and like the fact that you show how it all really works down to the printer and toner.
P.S.On a completely unrelated note.. Is Mr. David Veselka Lithuanian?
tsk tsk...
The actual idea is novel, but I'm not sure how large the demand will be: panorama software (especially on mobile phones) tends to be inconsistant and produces rendering errors, and most everything my iPhone produces isn't fit for large-format display. Moreover, the price is somewhat high. I acknowledge that printing large images is expensive, but this is a non-essential service and is somewhat of a gimmick. It will be hard to convince prospective customers to drop $25 on something like this.
However, the idea is novel and the name is great.
They'd be complaining less if they could read the texts before the images were loaded.
A simple way to do this, is to give the areas containing background-images a background-color that's close to the color of the image. This way, if there's text on top (white text for example) it'll be readable BEFORE the image loads.
They'll notice the wait time less.
Quick Bug: (Chrome on OS X, haven't checked elsewhere)for your modal (specifically modal.fade.in in bootstrap.css line 5004) you have "top:50%", which causes the very top of the modal to be cut off. Simply bumping it to 60% fixed it. Don't know if anybody else is having this same problem.
Best of luck to you!
I'd also really like some pictures of the finished product.
the images load quite slowly, so I'd compress them, but it looks great nevertheless!