cringe. "Here's a bunch of math so I must be really smart. Trust me guys." Math is awesome, but waving it around as if to automatically lends credibility to your argument is a poor showing IMHO.

Specifically, quantum decoherence is simply not accepted as a thing that exists on a macro scale. You're post presents no claim that is testable, despite the bold headline to the contrary.

Lets look at an example of a what physicists consider to be a falsifiable claim: The Standard Model predicts the existence of a new elementary particle, the Higgs Boson. This could be tested experimentally in theory, and later it was tested in practice, once the capability existed (LHC).

Or another example: orbital mechanics predicts the location of the asteroid Apophis will pass unusually close (<100 000KM) to earth in 2029.[1]

Now of course if Apophis fails to show up, or shows up overly late or in the wrong place etc, that doesn't necessarily invalidate the theory, but there does eventually need to be a credible explanation.

The simplest is usually measurement error, or silly human error etc. But every now and then, there are discrepancies that just don't go away, and those are often the ones that lead interesting new theories pushing science forward.

TBH I don't think your post does that.

The failing of physicists to take your above link seriously, does not epistemically speaking invalidate the claim of course, but it should be pause for concern.

[1]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/99942_Apophis