Okay, let's cut the crap.
Speaking as a knowledgable lawyer (It's not my specialty, but I studied it intensely in the past with experts :P), they are in fact, quite difficult to interpret.
This is even empirically true:
Different federal appeals courts (which have panels of knowledgable judges) have come to different conclusions about the scope, reach, and interpretation of different parts of the law.
I'm not sure what your evidence is to the contrary.
