Just make sure that if the technology you develop could make or break a student's success in school, that the technology cannot be denied to the student. It is hard to prevent a student from using a pen or a sheet of paper; it is not hard to deny a student access to a web app, and there are a lot of web apps that are vital to school (at least higher education) these days. My alma mater switched to Google for its email service; my current university also uses Google, and that means that Google could potentially deny students access to the most important communication system on campus (professors routinely communicate by email with students, and sometimes that is the only way to communicate). My school's libraries subscribe to web apps for reading books and research papers; a student who loses access to those systems could be left at a disadvantage, and that access could be revoked by the service provider.
It is also worth mentioning that technologies that require students to have access to high-end computers will put lower-income students at a disadvantage. If you offer videos, made standard-definition available. If you offer streaming, make downloading the video an option -- some students may have slow or capped connections at home and would benefit from being able to download a video on the school's connection, then bring it home and watch it offline. Don't assume that "everyone" has broadband, nor that "everyone" has a powerful graphics card, nor that "nobody" is using a computer from 2001 as their primary system. Some students only have computer access at school or at public libraries; don't assume that "everyone" has a computer in their home. The counterexamples to those assumptions will be people who are most in need of the technology you are talking about: they already get the shortest end of the stick when it comes to education.
