FunBug was "designed to drive consumer traffic and spending to online and offline client businesses" via games & sweepstakes.
His FunBug co-founder, Stephen Baumer, is the current CTO of GoPro.
Woodman credits FunBug's failure as partial inspiration for GoPro in that he wanted to pursue something he was genuinely passionate about.
So what?
Don't give up on the dream, fail fast and fail big, keep your best people close, and build stuff you wish existed.
Good stuff to think about with the new year around the corner.
1 - http://www.dmnews.com/funbugcom-looks-to-infest-the-net/arti...
2 - http://web.archive.org/web/20001017210942/http://www.funbug....
If you want to learn how to disrupt existing industries and build billion dollar companies from nothing, there are few better examples.
This sounds exactly like Flip (RIP). What do you think the difference was? The GoPro anti-shake technology & the ability to attach to helmets?
I think Flip was unlucky in that their releases coincided with the rise of smartphones, which took their lunch. When one device just takes video and costs around as much as an subsidized smartphone, there isn't any question which one I'm going to pick.
GoPro, though, wasn't hurt by the rise of smartphones. Surfers won't use smartphones for footage; they'll use the GoPro, since it's waterproof, has anti-shake, and other inportant features, targeted specifically at surfers.
Perhaps the moral is: when the rest of your industry is declining, focus on a niche, and execute well.
The flip probably could have found a new niche but cisco wasn't interested and basically let them be consumed by the advancement of technology.
But, apparently, when you build a great brand, find a solid niche and make something consumers WANT to buy - as opposed to need to buy - great things can happen.
I don't understand this comment. The food and pharmaceutical industries seem to be doing just fine, even though food and medicine are things that people need to buy.
The lesson here is that even seemingly established markets still contain a large value for people who get it right.
There are rumors of a GoPro IPO early next spring though[1], so he may have the cash very soon.
[1]: http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2012-10-17/gopro-widens...
Kind of standard for most billionaires (or even millionaires) no?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wealth_in_the_United_States#Wea...
One interesting thing is that we are seeing a huge amount of "fisheye" videos now because of Gopro. Where it was once an extremely gimmicky kind of image, now it is becoming much more normal to see. And in certain situations (surfing, skiing) it really makes sense.
Also, this post currently has a score of 88....
Woa.. spooky coincidence...
Anyways, spot on.
I don't do any sports, I'm not really interested in photography but a GoPro is something I always wanted.
I used it to record the plane landing as I came home from vacation and even use it to record my kids in the backseat while driving. It's a fun camera and congrats to woodman.
I did a time lapse of 5 days driving through the South-West on one occasion, and new SLC on another, and the picture quality is great, and its time lapse functionality is really amazing. The only problem is that it generates a lot of data... I had to scale down from 1 pic per second to 1 pic every 10s, and I still had about 30GB of data. Anyone considering using the GoPro for time lapse, though, 1s frequency is what you want for a smooth video afterwards, 10s is too coarse and it gets really jumpy.
Woodman is a surfer—the market was right in front of him. He saw a need, and he solved it with a very simple, high quality device tailored to that specific need.
A better argument there has never been for solving real problems with real solutions, rather than trying to essentially trick people into believing they both have a problem and need a solution. The latter is possible, but the former is a far better path to success.
But, yeah, they weren't aiming for the sports video market and they don't especially have a brand there. Actually, neither Nikon nor Canon have an especial brand in even waterproof cameras. (Canon does have one--only recently updated--Nikon AFAIK does not.) The point about getting out of bed in the morning is probably relevant. You get to a certain size of company and even large niches aren't especially interesting.
Separately - who are GoPro's competitors?
A competitor is Conture. Search devinsupertramp on YouTube to see a few videos they have sponsored him to make with the cameras. I think one is of a blob.
Contour Contour+2, ContourRoam
Sony Action Cam (HDR-AS10 and HDR-AS15)
Polaroid XS7, XS20 and XS100
CamOne (camonetec.com)
AEE BlackEye XTR (Magicam SD21) (www.aee.com/en/)
Tachyon (tachyoninc.com)
UnmannedTech FPV HD camera
Tons of unknown asian brands like 808 #16 720p micro camera ($8 to $40).
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/13/technology/13flip.html
That episode may be more a reflection on Cisco's confusion than anything wrong with the original product/market. (Perhaps with a less neglectful acquirer, Flip would have been a worthy competitor to GoPro.)
It'd have to flip mightily, Pure Digital did consumer "point and shoot" cameras, gopro does actioncams. They're the same thing only in that both are cameras (and then again, so are RED, would you argue RED is going to become a gopro competitor?)
Both also uniquely have excellent proprietary video codecs - RED has http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/REDCODE and GoPro acquired http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CineForm
AFAIK GoPro 3 is using Sony sensors, yet Sony can't seem to get it's act together to produce a decent GoPro competitor (ActionCam).
My money long term is on high quality sensors from Sony etc. running on Android, and h.265 for higher resolutions/framerates rivaling offerings from GoPro and RED. Give it 1-2 years.