undefined | Better HN

0 pointsrolph3d ago0 comments

its effort well worth it, and really is not a lot of effort. if you stole the plate, the theft is evident, when there are duplicates then it becomes difficult to know which one to suspect, and that also presupposes knowledge of the duplication.

you would have to realize, it is not feasible for a car to be in location 1 thenbe in location 2 many miles away in a few minutes.

the odd thing about criminals is thier effort to perpetuate crime is often far greater than getting a job, but is somehow the preferable option.

0 comments

3 comments · 1 top-level

FireBeyond3d ago· 2 in thread

> you would have to realize, it is not feasible for a car to be in location 1 thenbe in location 2 many miles away in a few minutes.

You say that but just last week there was a post here about how LPR claimed that the same car was in two locations in a timeframe that would have required the car to have been traveling non-stop at 160mph for 20 minutes through suburban streets, and even then authorities and proponents were defending it as plausible, or that the LPR was right, but there might just have been timing issues, or, or, or.

rolphOP3d ago

i think i saw that post, i think we're both describing what happens when someone copies plates and doppelgangs people to throw off the surveillance.

i think in this case the LPR was right, the same plate number was in two different places, the assumption of how many plates were involved needs review.

160mph for 20min through suburban streets, that kind of attracts attention, there would be a lot of complaints and witnesses if that happened

hansvm3d ago

It's also very likely not physically possible for that car, and unless they're referring to straight-line stroads, many suburban routes can't sustain an average of 160mph with any current car.

1 more reply

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse