Are you suggesting that Germany would be better off by keeping their current emissions until the mid ~2040s waiting for horrifyingly expensive new built nuclear power to come online?

Who cares if the emergency reserves are fossil gas when we still need to decarbonize agriculture, construction, aviation, industry, maritime shipping and so on?

When those emergency reserve emissions matter on the scale of the entire economy then force them to be zero carbon fuel, if still necessary.

You’re trying to blow up potential what if’s 15 years from now as the end of the world.

Followed by looking backwards. What you are complaining about is that 2010 solar was expensive and still get paid that expensive price.

What’s the relevance when it comes to choosing what the most efficient spending of money is in 2026?