undefined | Better HN

0 pointscounters6d ago0 comments

I'm not the big Lebowski but this is the "opinion" of the majority of scientific societies in the US as well as watchdog organizations who have long followed science regulatory and spending action.

It's not exactly new. We've been through this with the crackdown on climate science during the W Bush administration, with sequestration during the early/mid 2010's, and with the budget shenanigans during the first Trump administration. Denying the painfully obvious impact of our contemporary science policy is like fiddling while Rome is burning.

0 comments

3 comments · 2 top-level

qsera6d ago· 1 in thread

So that is their, possibly biased, opinion.

countersOP6d ago

Pedantry isn't really an admirable trait.

NoImmatureAdHom6d ago

Yeah, I mean it's bad in this really direct, near-term way. But we couldn't keep going the way we were going. It was insane. Pants-on-head retarded. And so my read, and my hope, is that this current period of trouble is the price for getting back on track. Treating truth as something that can be discovered. Funding people and ideas based on merit.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse