After 1.5 years of development and two exhausting pivots, I’m incredibly happy to finally have our v1 live!
While most of the HR tech is rushing to use black-box AI, I built the exact opposite. It's a transparent, math-driven fitness engine. It extracts objective data from CVs and calculates how well applicants match requirements, letting you see the reasoning behind why someone scored an X%.
If anyone here builds in the HR space or regularly hires engineers, I would absolutely love your feedback or a roast of the landing page.
PS This is a project of immense importance for me, I've been working on for past ~2 years, I'd appreciate to know why this comment is flagged.
> No black-box AI. Every candidate gets a detailed match receipt explaining exactly why they scored an 85%, complete with contextual evidence from their CV.
HR teams like to play dead when they actually have a file with detailed feedback on a candidate. Yet, they choose to keep that to themselves out of baseless legal fear. I wonder how that works out when somebody proves a company's filter consistently proves a specific bias gets rejected systematically.
and
> Automated assignment validation
which is particularly troubling for devs: companies scaling assignments as first screen. How do you get around "AI evaluating AI" loops especially about assignments ?
In our software, the candidate being assessed does not know all the assessment criteria. Furthermore, this assessment is merely a starting point for discussion during the technical round. I need to update the description of this feature.
Thanks for the valid points!
How do you deal with CVs like mine that refuse to list every <fancy keyword> I'm familiar with because it's pointless clutter? In that sense, and IME, the companies that only hire perfect fits are, more often than not, toxic.
P.S I work in an hrtech company.
I like the landing page.
So I am wondering what kind of tooling would be able to somehow spot the right people among flood of AI slops.
also matching requirements should be secondary to experience. someone who has done a few react websites will not be as qualified for your react job as someone that has done 10 years of angular and vue and can learn react in a short time.
We're a collaborative canvas + context engine for all the code and docs in your company, with a zoomable UI + CLI , where you can collaborate with your co-workers and agents.
We map technical debt, agent readiness, code complexity, security scanning, bus factor and more, so you can easily see how all the software in your company runs.
One of the most complex things is our incremental git blame engine built on top of GitOxide, as our backend is fully built on Rust. Our frontend is built on PixiJS so you can explore at gaming speed with 60Hz refresh rates.
Recently we sponsored Rust Week in Europe and a hundred or so developers tried our mini-game which is GeoGuessr for code, and got rave reviews. Future is looking bright!
The pitch: It's insane that we have to pull in Python or Lua to build C code. CMake is an abomination against god that has become usable in spite of itself. Zig cc is proof that this entire ecosystem is an embarrassment. My tool gives C projects a TOML manifest, and builds scripts written in C and JIT compiled by the tool. Now, you can write build scripts in the language itself, pull in dependencies you wanted to use anyway.
It also provides a stable ABI. There's an HTTP-backed index and a Git-backed index. And it generally does the same thing for C that, say, Bun did for JS/TS. You'll be able to run C files from source and have the entire ecosystem available. You'll be able to trivially generate single file static binaries, or dynamically link to an older glibc without arcane tricks. It will fix C.
I'm also still working on my "what if we wrote a real standard library for C"; I added some feedback I got from the release.
Conan is entirely python based
If you are a privacy minded person like me, you got only a few options when it comes to email with some ease of use: ProtonMail, Tuta etc. Rather than becoming a new competitor to those, I want to give the power of the decentralized email standard back into the users hand. Everyone with a bit of self-hosting/Linux knowledge, can setup their instances for themselves and their friends/family/business.
Bootstrapped that heavy via vibe coding. Used it to learn a lot about the email standard and related technology. However, I find it too valuable to just be a learning project. Now I'm cleaning it up to get in control again and to proof its secureness by rewriting/restructuring/refactoring line by line.
If the expiration is for example one day, you might never see it.
To my knowledge, Protonmail does not even show information that the email has expiration. Nor can you access log of deletions.
This feature was used against me on a court trial.
Also great video, it hooked me.
Most recently I was also probing people about how they conceptualize of the soul, making my own drawings, and asking others for drawings. If you have a few minutes I would also be interested in seeing how you would draw a soul, given pen and paper or equivalent materials. It often feels like for a lot of people the concept of the soul gets comingled with very confusing definitions.
There's a general problem where certain concepts become so overloaded that just disambiguating and clarifying what is meant becomes a challenge. I will note that if your first thought or question is whether the soul is even real, you might be confused about the definition or we might be referring to different concepts.
This is a nice notion, but it's not how the existing literature (going back very long) generally uses the term "soul." Conventionally speaking the term soul is theological and has ties to modes of spiritual salvation as it is considered a substance that persists beyond human mortality. What you're describing seems more like the term "self" or "ego" or "conscious awareness" as those terms are used in philosophy. You're welcome to create your own definitions, but if they trample over the prior art of the terms in literature that is hundreds if not thousands of years old then that's going to almost certainly lead to the confusion you say you're noticing among people.
for what it's worth my drawing of "the part of me that is the observer" would look like some subset of the brain.
I sometimes need to have a quick but realistic model of an optical system without paying a few thousand for some of the well known commercial offerings, so I've been building this.
It's not signed yet, but I have included the results of a Hybrid-Analysis scan and I am verified by Lemon Squeezy for the full version.
[1] https://apps.apple.com/us/app/reflect-track-anything/id64638...
still very early and im trying to keep it very affordable, since the whole point is I dont want people wasting their money on hustles that were never legit
There’s a Unix CLI tool that implements an accurate version of this… check out /bin/yes.
