Self declare engineering fails to meet expectations (opens in new tab)

Comment-driven development may be a useful design exercise, but calling it the only approach that follows engineering principles misunderstands engineering. Engineers don’t stop at documenting assumptions—they validate them.

I make out the title as The Merits Of Comment-Driven Development As Counterweight To TDD

Why did you editorialize it? I'm not sure the editorialized title is at all relevant.