undefined | Better HN

0 pointstyre14d ago0 comments

They were reviewing perf designations, then pulling up PR count, then arguing against designation based on the number of PRs opened.

0 comments

3 comments · 2 top-level

MarkusQ13d ago· 1 in thread

That still doesn't clarify: were they saying "many PRs→good" or "many PRs→bad" or "number of PRs is irrelevant" or...?

tyreOP13d ago

That PRs == impact.

Wait, PRs opened? Wouldn't merged make more sense?

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse