undefined | Better HN

0 pointsWarmWash18d ago0 comments

Amazon can just mix in more water post cooling and then by your metric the problem would be solved. They can just rely on dilution like the farmers do.

Or we can use our brain and actually hold the right people accountable.

0 comments

2 comments · 1 top-level

akramachamarei18d ago· 1 in thread

I'm finding it interesting to reason about this subject, not being a geologist and what not. It seems that there is a relatively stable rate at which the farms output nitrates regardless of how much water Amazon pumps from the aquifer. The issue RollingStone seems to have identified is that as Amazon pulls more water, it effectively concentrates the solutes by evaporating some of the water. As a result, less water going into wastewater treatment, so the pollutants are more highly concentrated. But the total amount of contaminants is unchanged, right? Unless Amazon's water consumption somehow increases the solutes output by the farms. Not sure how that would work, but it doesn't seem impossible.

Do you two think I've framed this issue correctly?

autoexec18d ago

It also drastically accelerated the rate that those nitrates entered the aquifer. Amazon pulled in and spit out tens of millions of gallons of water which forced the nitrates deeper and deeper into the earth until they contaminated the water source. Then amazon was pulling in contaminated water, concentrating the nitrates, and then spitting that out too pushing that even more polluted water into the earth.

The total amount of nitrates is basically the same. Where those nitrates ended up and at what concentrations is what changed once amazon came into the picture. People had clean drinkable water before amazon's data center. They'd have had to deal with the soil contamination eventually, but by forcing the pollution into their clean water supply and increasing the concentration of it amazon's data center made their water undrinkable.