undefined | Better HN

story

0 pointscodeka13y ago0 comments

The same could be said of UTF-16 implementations that don't support surrogate pairs.

0 comments

But that's not true for UCS-2, which can't represent certain code points.

On the other hand, UTF-8 is ASCII compatible and more efficient for text that's primarily ASCII.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

But that's not true for UCS-2, which can't represent certain code points.

On the other hand, UTF-8 is ASCII compatible and more efficient for text that's primarily ASCII.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse