undefined | Better HN

0 pointsboron100629d ago0 comments

Well the √t stuff looks like nonsense or way overblown, existing tools already do similar things, there’s pretty much a single commit with no follow up commits etc etc.

0 comments

3 comments · 1 top-level

aeve89029d ago· 2 in thread

O(√t) looks weird but it's real. the "naive trial division" primality test for example.

boron1006OP29d ago

It doesn’t apply to what this repo is doing. Also the 70 odd single author preprints seems to suggest the author is in some deep AI psychosis: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Logan-Nye-2

aeve89029d ago

Oh wow you weren't joking.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse