undefined | Better HN

0 pointsachierius1mo ago0 comments

First of all, you're confusing different events: iconoclasm was the destruction of Christian icons, by Christians who thought that practice was idolatrous.

> the battles were so bloody that the Christian victors not only converted the conquered

Who do you think 'conquered' the Swedes, some continental Frenchman? Their own kings converted, and thereafter converted their countrymen. And the first such Christian king, Olof Skötkonung, inherited the throne -- he didn't conquer it.

0 comments

1 comments · 1 top-level

mistrial91mo ago

I put the word "iconoclasm" in quotes because yes, you are right in a strict sense, but over time the word was broadened..

> Who do you think 'conquered' the Swedes

How can this written exchange now bring light to the subject?

I would say, infighting among fierce raiders was vanquished by organized and better equipped men to establish Nations. Tribal one-upmanship was/is rampant. I am touching a complicated topic over very long time periods. The educated Danes I know, do study French and Latin, actually.. but this is now and quite a lot of Danes moved to the USA a hundred years ago.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse