The file linked in by OP, is the main argument by Pawel Jarczak why his fork does not violate any copyright laws (may it be written by/with help of AI or not).
Personally I found the article (not the tweets) much more useful to understand the context of all this, as someone very out of the loop. Certianly more useful to me than a long list of very specific, in my option largely LLM output, points about a codebase I'm entirely unfamiliar with with claims that seem to need a legal team and court case to be meaningful. Slop is somewhat unfair and I'm happy to be disagreed with.
Here's the frequency of the " - " pattern in tweets by "josefprusa"
2020: 8 / 761 tweets = 1.1%
2021: 5 / 533 tweets = 0.9%
2022: 9 / 597 tweets = 1.5%
2023: 21 / 450 tweets = 4.7%
2024: 57 / 725 tweets = 7.9%
2025: 23 / 390 tweets = 5.9%
2026: 15 / 136 tweets = 11.0%