In one way it was sycophantic, frequently saying how "sharp" my ideas were, but I just reminded myself to discount that. In other ways it pushed back. If the math didn't work out to the conclusions I expected, it pointed that out. It was like working with a reasonably smart, extremely productive, but less creative coworker.
I don't think it made me lazier, because it was intense and exhausting. But I learned a lot.
That raises a pretty serious question about regulating AI usage in education, and it’s surprising how little attention that discussion still gets.
Did advanced machining operators who used to perform all machine setup and operation in an analog way themselves become lazy and dumb when (computer) numerical control took over? Are modern machinists dumb? Or are they just smart in a different domain now that the positioning is actually taken care of?
It's like asking people to dig a hole and giving some of them a shovel and asking others to do it with their hands. Or asking them to go to a location a half mile away with a bike and then taking it away the nex time. They're not going to be real enthused after experiencing mechanical advantage.
Anyone that thinks that using AI for just 10 minutes has a real and lasting effect on intelligence might need to go back and do a little more training of theirs. Significantly more than 10 minutes of training, because 10 minutes will do nothing.
The more tech we invent and use, the dumber and lazier we get.
AI chatbots do not have agency, they are not actively trying to take over your thinking. People can prompt them to do their thinking for them, or they can prompt to get examples and help with understanding.