Skip to content
Better HN
Top
Best
Ask
Show
New
Jobs
Search
⌘K
0 points
Munksgaard
1mo ago
0 comments
Save
Share
> Why would it be?
That's literally what they explain in the rest of the comment.
0 comments
1 comments · 1 top-level
top
newest
oldest
cubefox
1mo ago
No, they don't reference any "high price to pay", only that they personally didn't need the advantages of untagged union types so far, and that Haskell (allegedly) has patterns that would play a similar role for libraries.
j
/
k
navigate · click thread line to collapse