Ask HN: Instead of intrusive age-check why can't we have "two internet"?

2 pointskreco10d ago3 comments

Let's say I'm a parent with some kids, they each have a smartphone and SIM cards, and so they can connect to the internet.

Why cannot the internet/phone provider place them on an "alternative" network with alternative defaults, like kid-friendly DNS and what not? Since the age of the customer is likely to be known at the subscription time.

At home, you would need two connections, one "normal" and one kid-friendly, with another default DNS. You can select which one is the default that would be picked up by the Ethernet cable. Then you just need two wifi network, exactly as you can have "guest access".

Am I being too naive or would this solve like 99% of the problems at very low complexity cost?

3 comments

rolph10d ago

[delayed]

theandrewbailey10d ago

Both connections would use the same "kid unfriendly" internet. You could set DNS servers, but each client can use another DNS server. You'd need a completely separate network (and connection) in order for it to be foolproof.

1 more reply

diavelguru10d ago

Interesting idea. Would need new laws enacted and government oversight which I'm not sure how people feel about that especially for minors. Maybe there will come a time where all people (in the US or otherwise) have some form of government document that uniquely identifies them (a trusted identity platform not just an ID) though there is and will be lots of pushback. A simple search revealed this: "The implementation of universal government ID systems, particularly digital IDs, is frequently criticized as a key component of a dystopian surveillance state. Critics warn that such systems can lead to mass surveillance, restriction of freedom of movement, and control over personal, financial, and medical lives." So take it for what you will. Can we do this? Yes. Will we is another matter.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse