undefined | Better HN

0 pointsNiallBunting1mo ago0 comments

Yeah, apps wouldn't be able to only listen to the firehose.

There are some proposals for private files. However, I'm outside the AtProto world so not sure what exactly the suggested implementations are. I just hope they give enough control.

I think the technology could potentially be used for way more than microblogging. I would love to use webapps that store the data on my devices and share it with specific people. The data and access under my control.

[1]: https://dholms.leaflet.pub/3mhj6bcqats2o

0 comments

2 comments · 1 top-level

blackqueeriroh1mo ago· 1 in thread

What you linked is by Bluesky’s own staff - it’s him laying out the design plans for the protocol’s private data implementation.

He’s doing it to engage publicly with the community, since many of us also build on the protocol.

nightpool1mo ago

> Sync is pull-based. Applications are responsible for staying in sync with all member PDSes. PDSes assist by sending lightweight write notifications to prompt pulls when new data is written.

It looks like this basically just reinvents ActivityPub (local servers can pull or push to remote servers). So it defeats all of the "benefits" you get from Bluesky's firehose-based approach anyway, except for the fact that Bluesky assumes you're going to be using their AppView and they will always have access to your private data.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse