undefined | Better HN

0 pointspjmlp14d ago0 comments

All cloud vendors are buggy, and if you aren't paying enough there are only bots to talk to.

0 comments

It would appear that GCP and aws are in a different league of bugginess compared to Azure.

Azure seems to be relying on constant human intervention, the other 2 didn't get a special mention from Pentagon. There was a recent insider article cycle on just how broken and misguided the whole Azure department is.

pjmlpOP13d ago

Yes, GCP is really bad, I would not use it ever again, if given the option.

Just like every Google service only bots, and the most expensive to actually get humans to talk to.

AWS, it is a maze of products, IAM a pain to deal with, tooling for doing serverless directly from Webshell relatively painfull,....

I bet insider articles from AWS and GCP would be quite similar in quality, especially given how much they do in offshoring.

TitaRusell13d ago

If you want cheap that's what you get. Service costs money.

Like how my local supermarket prefers hiring teenagers.

pjmlpOP13d ago

Depending on your wallet size, all cloud services are great,

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 comments

jojobas13d ago

It would appear that GCP and aws are in a different league of bugginess compared to Azure.

pjmlpOP13d ago

Yes, GCP is really bad, I would not use it ever again, if given the option.

Just like every Google service only bots, and the most expensive to actually get humans to talk to.

AWS, it is a maze of products, IAM a pain to deal with, tooling for doing serverless directly from Webshell relatively painfull,....

I bet insider articles from AWS and GCP would be quite similar in quality, especially given how much they do in offshoring.

TitaRusell13d ago

If you want cheap that's what you get. Service costs money.

Like how my local supermarket prefers hiring teenagers.

pjmlpOP13d ago

Depending on your wallet size, all cloud services are great,

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse