Skip to content
Better HN
Top
Best
Ask
Show
New
Jobs
Search
⌘K
0 points
childintime
2mo ago
0 comments
Save
Share
What about APL? Sigh, why not just use named functions?
I also doubt array comprehensions are a win, it feels like niche syntax.
0 comments
3 comments · 1 top-level
top
newest
oldest
jampekka
2mo ago
· 2 in thread
> Sigh, why not just use named functions?
I.e. a Lisp?
childintime
OP
2mo ago
> Inspired by: CoffeeScript, Lisp, Ruby | Powered by: Bun
jampekka
2mo ago
I meant that most Lisps are named functions/macros only (with some named special forms), and you are calling for that kind of syntax?
j
/
k
navigate · click thread line to collapse