undefined | Better HN

0 pointsbmitc2mo ago0 comments

I said "government subsidized" and then later expanded out to subsidies, grants, and contracts. You know what I meant. There isn't dishonesty remotely anywhere.

And the point of conflict of interest still stands and is unargued while we still argue the meaning of "government subsidized".

0 comments

1 comments · 1 top-level

inemesitaffia1mo ago

Contracts aren't subsidies and that's just one facet of your dishonesty. Where are these grants?

The other part is the money you're talking about was almost all spent/awarded before this current government. There's your conflict of interest.

You aren't mistaken. You know you're spreading misinformation about this stuff

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse