undefined | Better HN

0 pointspshirshov2mo ago0 comments

> apple containers

Virtual machines. I can't ask claude to figure out an issue on the hw host w/o falling back to per-action confirmations or giving it full unconditional access. When everything runs on one host I can organize controllable sandbox escapes for Claude and let it work in huge batches with minimal attention.

> won't be using

Well, that's your choice to avoid efficient agentic workflows

> misunderstood

There are no containers on mac, there are VMs hosting containers and subtractive sandbox filtering syscalls.

> get as much

FW 13 is great, FW 16 is a disaster.

0 comments

2 comments · 2 top-level

cassianoleal2mo ago

> I can't ask claude to figure out an issue on the hw host w/o falling back to per-action confirmations or giving it full unconditional access.

Yeah that seems to confirm my suspicion that we have very different use cases. :)

> I can't ask claude to figure out an issue on the hw host w/o falling back to per-action confirmations or giving it full unconditional access.

Doesn't help me if the agent is efficient but I'm not. :D

> There are no containers on mac, there are VMs hosting containers and subtractive sandbox filtering syscalls.

I understand the tech. It serves the purpose I need from it.

> FW 13 is great, FW 16 is a disaster.

Thanks! I did take a quick peek at the 16 but I find it too big anyway.

jim334422mo ago

Why do you need agents patching your kernel to enable efficient agentic workflows? Are those agents working on building a kernel? If they're just building some web backend or whatever, I don't see why any of this is needed.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse