This just feels like unbridled, blind distaste for Anthropic. Everyone's entitle to their opinion, but the blog post doesn't add much to the internet's general knowledge in my opinion.
The smoking gun he wants to dig in on is that the CVE was posted 12 days before the Mythos launch, and only attributed to "Claude" not "Mythos".
I can't even.
The 4.7 model card talks extensively about Mythos with a bunch of benchmarks, showing significant step improvements. 12 days is a ... pretty reasonable disclosure window. Why would you tell the world your codename for your new Claude model early?
There must be something else to complain about. Like, for instance, that 4.7 is not an improvement on 4.6 for my workflows. That is worth a blog post. This? ...
