> the thought and idea is theirs, it was communicated
Are they? I don't know how much they used AI, the entire article could be written from a one sentence prompt and so I'd argue that the thoughts and ideas are not their own.
This isn't like using a spell checker, it's like using a ghost writer.
I have no reason to believe the idea wasn't theirs, neither do you. It's just another dialect, or jargon-set being used for communication. that's about as much as anyone could claim to prove about the post. but here we are debating about speculative things that mean nothing, other than some anti-ai crusading.
I think efforts are better spent boiling oceans, or getting angry at the sun.
