undefined | Better HN

0 pointsLunicLynx2mo ago0 comments

Came here to say the same. Same tools + private. In security two different defense-mechanisms are always better than one.

0 pointsLunicLynx2mo ago0 comments

Came here to say the same. Same tools + private. In security two different defense-mechanisms are always better than one.

0 comments

5 comments · 1 top-level

bluebarbet2mo ago· 4 in thread

Same tools A, B and C, but minus tools D, E and F, and with a smaller chance that any tools at all will even be used.

Not claiming that it's a slam dunk for open source, but the inverse does not seem correct either.

lelanthran2mo ago

> Same tools A, B and C, but minus tools D, E and F,

Why "minus D, E and F"? After all, once you have the harness set up, there's no additional work to add in new models, right?

bluebarbet2mo ago

The point being that there are always going to be more eyes, and more knowledge of available tools (i.e. including "D, E and F"), and more experience using them, with open source than with a single in-house dev team.

lelanthran2mo ago

There's no more "eyes" though, it's all models, and they are all converging pretty damn fast.

1 more reply

LunicLynxOP2mo ago

Fair enough

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 comments

5 comments · 1 top-level

bluebarbet2mo ago· 4 in thread

Same tools A, B and C, but minus tools D, E and F, and with a smaller chance that any tools at all will even be used.

Not claiming that it's a slam dunk for open source, but the inverse does not seem correct either.

lelanthran2mo ago

> Same tools A, B and C, but minus tools D, E and F,

Why "minus D, E and F"? After all, once you have the harness set up, there's no additional work to add in new models, right?

bluebarbet2mo ago

lelanthran2mo ago

There's no more "eyes" though, it's all models, and they are all converging pretty damn fast.

1 more reply

LunicLynxOP2mo ago

Fair enough

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse