Also, is this another nail in the coffin for "all calories are the same" ? Feels like it.
I am not a mouse, but I definitely preference some carbs over others. Mind you, given a choice between snacking on an umami laden bowl of salami, cheese, miso, burnt-crunchy-bits-from-the-dinner-roast or carbs, I'd eat all of them.
So while there might be gut bacteria effect changes of it some people at least show no different blood glucose response.
Since Ozempic came out it should be obvious even to the most hardcore "all calories are the same" people that this is blatently false and that the hormonal response to foods is what drives satiety, not "calories".
The only thing hormones can affect is your maintenance requirement, meaning you can gain weight if your body chooses to store the calories instead of burning them for whatever reason, even while eating the same as always.
I don't think that's true. I think the basis of keto is ketosis, not a matter of satiety per calories.
From personal experience keto has convinced binge eaters that they need to wear a CGM and avoid foods like beans and carrots, foods they weren’t eating much of in the first place but probably should eat more of.
People who value other things higher than how it feels to eat and be full, like athletes and actors, can accurately manage their weight with calorie counting. It’s often not a pleasurable experience, but they subject themselves to it to meet their professional goals.
> When wheat flour was removed from the diet, both body weight and metabolic abnormalities improved quickly.
Bread is not only wheat flour. And humans do not eat flour.
Maybe the added sugar in "bread" has a role ?
