I am saying this is exactly what's happening, but with more robust language. If you disallow Amazon, maybe there is a third party that offers our services to Amazon. So Amazon-the-string is not the bogeyman; the concern is the resale or hosted-service arrangement they can access.

So you see formulations that target infrastructure resale rather than specific entities, such as:

"For the avoidance of doubt, the following scenarios are not permitted under the license:

* A managed service that lets third party developers ... register their own [SERVICE] service endpoints and invoke them through that managed service."

"You may not provide the software to third parties as a hosted or managed service, where the service provides users with access to any substantial set of the features or functionality of the software."

"If you make the functionality of the Program or a modified version available to third parties as a service, you must make the Service Source Code available via network download to everyone at no charge, under the terms of this License [...] where 'Service Source Code' is defined broadly to include the entire hosting stack (monitoring, backups, etc.) to ensure a level playing field"