I really hope that they are not taking Hiroshima and Nagasaki as models. Those were part of a very different conflict at a very different time. A similar approach would produce very different results.
If they simply mean "nuclear bombs" they'll have to come up with a very different justification and strategy than the US used 80 years ago. If it's just "it worked then so it'll work now", then things are going to go very, very, very badly.