I'm just curious about the best takes on this: do you see any way in which human discussion forums like HN survive in the long term? How, and by the way, what would be a good measure of success (because there is a whole spectrum of AI influence: AI shaping beliefs of participants, users letting AI write exact posts/comments, users letting AI only reformat posts/comments, etc)?
every substack link I clicked on from hn this morning was ai generated. ai photo and text lol. that means when we comment on those posts we are commenting on someones prompting and not that persons original thoughts. there needs to be a zero ai tag we can filter so I dont have to consume ai gen content. its getting ridiculous
Maybe I could've worded it a bit better, the question is not whether forums such as HN will continue to exist, but whether/how it is possible to keep them "human", and also what appropriate definitions of that could be.
Online discussion forums have never been "human". You can rightfully point out that in the past human operators were required to keep the software operational as an implementation detail, and that we may be reaching a point where they are no longer an implementation need, but it is just that: An implementation detail. An alternative implementation does not really change anything. The medium is the message.
