"Why would I commit something written by AI with myself as author?"

Because you're the one who decided to take responsibility for it, and actually choose to PR it in its ultimate form.

What utility do the reviews/maintainers get from you marking whats written by you vs. chatgpt? Other than your ability to scapegoat the LLM?

The only thing that actually affects me (the hypothetical reviewer) and the project is the quality of the actual code, and, ideally, the presence of a contributer (you) who can actually answer for that code. The presence or absence of LLM generated code by your hand makes no difference to me or the project, why would it? Why would it affect my decision making whatsoever?

Its your code, end of story. Either that or the PR should just be rejected, because nobody is taking responsibility for it.

> Why would I commit something written by AI as myself?

I don't use any paid AI models (for all my usecases, free models usually work really well) and so for some small scripts/prototypes, I usually just use even sometimes the gemini model but aistudio.google.com is good one too.

I then sometimes, manually paste it and just hit enter.

These are prototypes though, although I build in public. Mostly done for experimental purpoess.

I am not sure how many people might be doing the same though.

But in some previous projects I have had projects stating "made by gemini" etc.

maybe I should write commit message/description stating AI has written this but I really like having the msg be something relevant to the creation of file etc. and there is also the fact that github copilot itself sometimes generate them for you so you have to manually remove it if you wish to change what the commit says.

I'm not against putting AI as coauthor, but removing the human who allowed the commit to be pushed/deployed from the commit would be a security issue at my job. The only reason we're allowed to deploy code with a generic account is that we tag the repo/commit hash, and we wrote a small piece of code that retrieve the author UID from git, so that in the log it say 'user XXXNNN opened the flux xxx' (or something else depending on what our code does)

If you review the code then committing as yourself makes perfect sense to me