I agree that's bad at any rate. However, I genuinely think that reading and learning without literal reproduction is not (should not be) a violation of copyright and does not (should not) require an additional grant for content that has been made publicly available. I think that regardless of whether a company is the subject or the actor.
Yep, and Anthropic lost that case correctly. I just don't think that "you have to buy one copy" will fix anything related to AI to the satisfaction of anybody but the law.
