undefined | Better HN

0 points0x3f1mo ago0 comments

Well if they're only an upstart, they don't have the ability to destroy you _yet_. You 'nuke' them in the hope they won't get that ability. You're aiming to stop MAD from being a thing.

In those terms, the US should have been nuking and dominating everyone, and the idea was floated after WW2, but I believe they were precluded by practical limitations.

If they had developed the tech outside of wartime, and built up a stockpile, maybe that is indeed what would have happened and we'd have a one-world government already.

0 comments

lstodd1mo ago

Point is you cannot know if they are an upstart (whatever upstart means). It can be misinterpretation, it can be camoflage, it can be anything. But once you rain death you're better be prepared to be grateful for what you are about to receive back.

0x3fOP1mo ago

Depends on the context. We certainly knew nobody else had nukes.

the_af1mo ago

> Depends on the context. We certainly knew nobody else had nukes.

You wouldn't be able to know this over the vast distances of the universe.

People are arguing two contradictory things: these are unfathomable alien civilizations with motivation and timescale we cannot comprehend, but we would perfectly understand their tech level, location, and capability of striking back.

It doesn't add up. It's a scifi premise needed for interesting plot conflict.

lstodd1mo ago

That.. was the case for all of four years. And forgive me if I doubt certainity.

0x3fOP1mo ago

Four years is plenty of time to start launching. Also, MAD incentivizes disclosure. What would be the point of having secret nukes? Openly having them is the only way to stop the US using its nukes to stop your nuke program, in this scenario.

middayc1mo ago

The dynamics at least with the space dark forest is different than when we live on the same planet. It has to do with lack/slow communication over vast space (that you can't trust anyway).

It relied on two principles "the chain of suspicion" and "technological explosion", which don't hold true if we are on the same planet. You can google it (or llm it) :)

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 comments

lstodd1mo ago

0x3fOP1mo ago

Depends on the context. We certainly knew nobody else had nukes.

the_af1mo ago

> Depends on the context. We certainly knew nobody else had nukes.

You wouldn't be able to know this over the vast distances of the universe.

It doesn't add up. It's a scifi premise needed for interesting plot conflict.

lstodd1mo ago

That.. was the case for all of four years. And forgive me if I doubt certainity.

0x3fOP1mo ago

middayc1mo ago

The dynamics at least with the space dark forest is different than when we live on the same planet. It has to do with lack/slow communication over vast space (that you can't trust anyway).

It relied on two principles "the chain of suspicion" and "technological explosion", which don't hold true if we are on the same planet. You can google it (or llm it) :)

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse