So Claude repos are statistically more likely to have stars than the average GitHub repo. Not the conclusion the headline was going for.

Sounds like Claude commits are, on average, going into higher visibility repositories than humans… maybe the author would like to reconsider their approach?

I think this is useful in answering the grandparent comment's question:

stars : uniq(k)

1 : 14946505

10 : 1196622

100 : 213026

1000 : 28944

10000 : 1847

100000 : 20

You should check recent commits, because obviously there are a lot of forked 0 star repos.

How do you know that?