undefined | Better HN

0 pointscucumber37328421mo ago0 comments

There are millions of people who are self employed in an industry where they could be maimed or killed if they screw up who manage to make it to retirement.

I think the better question is how you get a system in which people are only responsible for any one facet to get the same performance out of people that a painter can get out of himself when he's setting up his own ladder that he personally has to climb on.

0 comments

pythonaut_161mo ago

I don't think the GPs point is about personal safety of workers, but rather critical safety systems that rely on one person with no backups. Like an ATC tower for a busy airport staffed by a single person on an overnight shift.

A painter who does a bad job setting up a ladder is going to have a bad time, a lone ATC operator having a heart attack potentially puts multiple large aircraft full of people in danger...

bombcar1mo ago

The goal should always be to reduce the human dependency - where reasonable which is where all the argument is, because of the cost/benefit analysis.

Mandatory scaffolding for roofing contractors would save some amount of deaths/injuries (and the related expenses) but add expenses to each job.

Some roofing firms refuse to operate without scaffolding; you pay for it or you find someone else.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse