undefined | Better HN

0 pointsbusterarm1d ago0 comments

Careful. Preemption takes many forms, some of them many would find unpalatable.

0 comments

Those schoolgirls were obviously going to be a problem for the US in the next 20 years.

gos91d ago

Unpalatable preemption is generally better than reentry vehicles coming down your chimney.

The problem there is you can't prove anything would have come down the chimney if the preemption is successful, so people will still be unhappy.

busterarmOP1d ago

I agree, but some of them are more obvious.

Like not giving 100 billion dollars to someone who actively wants to kill you.

wat100001d ago

A thought experiment: would the world be a better place if the US had preemptively attacked the USSR in the 50s or early 60s when it was possible to do without more than “get[ting] our hair mussed” as General Turgidson put it?

XorNot1d ago

But it's also the basic l basis of deterrence and the destabilizing nature of ICBM defense: relying on interceptors presumes the war happens.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse