undefined | Better HN

0 pointsgaraetjjte3mo ago0 comments

Well clearly there is use for these - how do you distinguish what you are accessing in smart-pointer-like types.

0 comments

1 comments · 1 top-level

You'd still use the "." operator. Value, reference, or smart pointer use the same syntax. This means you can refactor them easily.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse