undefined | Better HN

0 pointsdomoritz6d ago0 comments

Arxiv can recompile latex to support accessibility and html. Going to pdf submissions would be a major step backward.

0 comments

Make it an external service then, and leave the thing that's already working great to just be.

The reason authors like and use arxiv is that it gives 1) a timestamp, 2) a standardized citable ID, and 3) stable hosting of the pdf. And readers like the no-nonsense single click download of the pdf and a barebones consistent website look.

All else is a side show.

OneDeuxTriSeiGo6d ago

You have to keep in mind that an increasing portion of their time and labor is going towards moderation and filtering due to a mass influx of nonsensical AI generated papers, non-academic numerology-tier hackery, and other useless drivel.

Spinning the service off forces other the labor out onto other universities rather than leaving them to solely Cornell

bonoboTP6d ago

Is the problem the storage cost for hosting them, the HDDs? I'm sure they can be offloaded to cold storage because most of that slop won't be opened by anyone.

Arxiv doesn't need moderation. Nobody is asking for Arxiv moderation. It needs minimal checks to remove overtly illegal content.

3 more replies

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 comments

bonoboTP6d ago

Make it an external service then, and leave the thing that's already working great to just be.

All else is a side show.

OneDeuxTriSeiGo6d ago

Spinning the service off forces other the labor out onto other universities rather than leaving them to solely Cornell

bonoboTP6d ago

Is the problem the storage cost for hosting them, the HDDs? I'm sure they can be offloaded to cold storage because most of that slop won't be opened by anyone.

Arxiv doesn't need moderation. Nobody is asking for Arxiv moderation. It needs minimal checks to remove overtly illegal content.

3 more replies

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse