undefined | Better HN

0 pointsserf7d ago0 comments

allowed shell pipes doesn't necessarily mean they want loops running them.

One of the economic tuning features of an LLM is to nudge the LLM into reaching conclusions and spending the tokens you want it to spend for the question.

presumably everyone running a form of ralph loop against every single workload is a doomsday situation for LLM providers.

0 comments

whateveracct7d ago

> allowed shell pipes doesn't necessarily mean they want loops running them.

insane that people apologize for this at all. we went from FOSS software being standard to a proprietary cli/tui using proprietary models behind a subscription. how quickly we give our freedom away.

gck16d ago

Anthropic itself advertised their own implementation of agentic loop (Ralph plugin). Sure, it worked via their official plugin, but the end result for Anthropic would be the same.

There's nothing in TOS that prevents you from running agentic loops.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse