Skip to content
Better HN
Top
Best
Ask
Show
New
Jobs
Search
⌘K
0 points
MoonZ
3mo ago
0 comments
Save
Share
25 years of Python behind me, please let me tell you that hopefully you're wrong : we don't "need" uv :)
0 comments
3 comments · 1 top-level
top
newest
oldest
jredwards
3mo ago
· 2 in thread
Need is definitely too strong a word, but I think we can agree that uv has so far been the best solution to a problem that plagued python development for a really long time.
JackSlateur
3mo ago
https://nesbitt.io/2025/12/26/how-uv-got-so-fast.html
globular-toast
3mo ago
At least we know what the solution should look like now, and now we can rewrite it in Python and make sure it works with pypy so it's fast.
j
/
k
navigate · click thread line to collapse