undefined | Better HN

0 pointssamrus1mo ago0 comments

Thats a bit pedantic. Youre still arguing against an entity rather than addressing the argument.

If you prompted an LLM to make a PSA that people should brush their teeth, is it a fair to argue that brushing your teeth is bad because an LLM made the argument?

0 comments

egberts11mo ago

Let's call it "Ad machinam".

A literal form of "to the machine”: none of the rights that a person has.

Example usage:

“That’s not a rebuttal; it’s an argumentum ad machinam -- you’re rejecting it just because AI wrote it.”

normalaccess1mo ago

And really when you think about it, all AI is is just the a statical recombination of (almost) everything that (almost) everyone has written.

So it's a kind of mechanical recombination of ideas.

egberts11mo ago

Almost like reject the argument because the logical reasoning was supplied emotionally.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 comments

egberts11mo ago

Let's call it "Ad machinam".

A literal form of "to the machine”: none of the rights that a person has.

Example usage:

“That’s not a rebuttal; it’s an argumentum ad machinam -- you’re rejecting it just because AI wrote it.”

normalaccess1mo ago

And really when you think about it, all AI is is just the a statical recombination of (almost) everything that (almost) everyone has written.

So it's a kind of mechanical recombination of ideas.

egberts11mo ago

Almost like reject the argument because the logical reasoning was supplied emotionally.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse