>I'm disclosing a list containing the details of 6,681 organizations that applied for contracts with the US Department of Homeland Security. This data was taken from the Office of Industry Partnership at https://oip.dhs.gov.
Contrary to the title this doesn't seem like all contractors? 6681 contractors in total seems a bit low for an agency as big as DHS.
This is consistent with the explorer having a drop down filter for "Program" with options exactly matching three of the four programs listed as OIP programs o their webpage, excluding "Targeted Broad Agency Announcements”, which from the description OIP participates in but are specifically for some other particular DHS component (which, might handles the actual contracting, which would explain why the data wasn't in the OIP leak, OTOH, the list of current opportunities in that category on the web is empty, so its possible that it is a category that exists in theory but is not actively being used currently.)
This is very much not all DHS contracts, and even the claim that it is "ICE/DHS" contracts seems mostly misleading clickbait trading on the degree of attention to and awareness of ICE even though these contracts are through and for a non-ICE component of DHS.
https://www.usaspending.gov/search?hash=181b0ab9a8cc9f30fbed...
What sort of US government organization hides its contractors?
Why do you mention something like that without providing a link?
It anyone's interested, it's the "Cyber Apex Solutions, LLC" contract, and this looks like it has more info: https://www.washingtontechnology.com/2017/07/dhs-picks-cyber.... It looks like it's from 9 years ago.
A guy with a hotmail address hasn't been to a club in decades.
"The human body is a near perfect energy generator. Demand for energy harvesting innovation, along with technology advances in thin film thermoelectric generators and highly efficient DC/DC boost circuitry now place wearable thermoelectric power harvesting within reach. The objective of Perpetua`s Phase II proposal is to deliver an energy harvesting system for first responder applications powered by the human body. Building on Perpetua`s successful demonstration of wearable thermoelectric generators in Phase I, this proposal combines advances in wearable thermoelectric generators, power electronics, ultra low power transceivers, and physiological sensors integrated into a first responder jacket. In collaboration with emergency response personnel, Perpetua will field test the developed jackets. Building on several decades of experience with thermoelectric generators, system design and product integration, Perpetua will architect modular systems for wearable body energy harvesting. Perpetua`s creative approach with best-in-class technology overcomes the traditional obstacles that have prevented energy harvesting from the human body to produce adequate voltage and usable power. Wearable human body thermoelectric generators promise power solutions for autonomous self-powered sensors reducing the weight, size, and limited life of primary battery power. Long life and small dimensions are particularly important and advantageous for sensor systems for the first responder."
"Science Applications International Corp"
"Radiation Monitoring Devices Inc"
"Physical Optics Corp"
"Physical Sciences Inc"
"Applied Nanotech Inc"
edit: this is a light hearted comment. i am not saying your favorite non-descriptly-named company is worse than any other name.
is "non-descript" an insult now, or something? where do you read "worse" in my comment?
i am sorry, i really must have messed up in my comment somewhere. on top of not trying to insult these companies by saying they have non-descript names, i was also not trying to imply that they are small.
non-descript, and what i expected of government contractor names. thats all.
Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company
General Mills
General Motors
American Telephone and Telegraph Company…
You seem to have it backwards. Companies being called Poopity Scoop is a modern phenomenon.
Companies have otherwise been named like this for centuries.
(i didnt make the judgement you think i made. i simply said they are what i expected: very non-descript)
Automatically identifying person-based characteristics is helpful in variety of industries for threat detection. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is interested in a video analysis tool that can automatically identify and catalog anthropometric characteristics that are important to On-Person Screening in real time. Toyon Research Corporation proposes to tackle this problem by breaking it into main parts to solve. First, the task of initially localizing and describing airline passenger characteristics can be framed as an object detection problem. Second, the task of tracking airline passengers across a video stream once the characteristics have been initially identified can be done through traditional tracking algorithms that have the ability to run in real-time.
